One Party System and its courses - colonial political era
Factors
for the Establishment of One Party System
One Party System means having only one political party
which dominates/takes power. No competing environment exists for political
aspects
Internal Factors
Here three factors have been identified.
The first factor is the nature and character of political
competition to state power. Political competition took place at two stages, first at the stage of struggling of independence and second at the stage of consolidating state power after
independence. At the stage of
consolidating state power after independence you had the ruling
party and the opposition parties. The interest of the opposition party was to take over state power from the ruling parties during subsequent
elections, while the interest of the ruling parties was to consolidate and perpetuate their position of power. The tendency was for the
faction in power to consolidate and perpetuate its position of power by elimination
of
the opposition parties.
The second important factor was that the class that took state power at independence
had
no economic base, the economy was under the control of foreigners and most members of the ruling group were from economic poor
background. This means that the struggle for political power was also struggle for economic power. Therefore, political competition
was
also competition
for
the scarce resources. To ensure this those already in power had to perpetuate their state office.
The third factor was colonial legacy. The colonial system was by nature non-democratic system
as it was an imposed state
not based
on democratic
institutions
and practices.
Under colonialism pre-colonial democratic institutions and aspects of democratic culture were
destroyed and new ones could not be developed.
2. External Factors
One source says that there was influence of Ancient Greece, and in particular
the political philosophy of Plato. Plato is argued that in his political philosophy become authoritarian and
hostile to democratic ideas. Plato developed the theory of rule by few who are good and wise, to rule over many who are bad and ignorant. He called democratic rule as rule of the mob. It
therefore said that
most
of the African
leaders adopted Plato’s
ideas
and thus
becoming
Platonic. It is
thus claimed that
the establishment of one-party political systems by these
leaders was due to platonic tendencies and attitude. Another source of
influence is said to have
been communist
influence from China, the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe Cuba and even North Korea. It is claimed that some ruling parties in Africa such as TANU in Tanzania by the
1960s had developed association with Mao’s China and later Eastern Europe. This is given
more
weight
more
it is
argued
that some countries
in Africa were
even supported by
socialist
countries in their armed struggles against colonialism. While this contribution of external
influence cannot be denied, we would like to argue that internal dynamics appear to have played
a
more
significant
and predominant role.
To start
with,
both
external
sources of
influence seem to be based on weak foundations. On the influence of Ancient Greece, nowhere
is it clearly shown
under what conditions and circumstances were most African leaders who
adopted one party system in the 1960s and 1970s influenced by platonic
philosophy resulting into the development of platonic attitudes. The education background of most of them was characterised
by
liberal ideas of multi-party democracy which they acquired under colonial
education.
On the influence of communism
from China, Eastern Europe and Soviet Union, etc there are a
number of
facts which seem to water down the magnitude of
its contribution. First the ideas on
one
party system began to be developed by some African leaders such as Nyerere and Nkrumah
long before contacts and relations were developed with the communist countries. For example, Tanzania began to establish
friendly relations with China in 1965, while Nyerere’s ideas on one
party began to be developed as early as 1962. Secondly a number of African countries that established
one
party system were ideologically hostile to Marxism, Leninism and Maoism.
Kenya and Malawi are typical
examples.
Thus we can argue that rather than being important factors, these
external
influences
merely facilitated the consolidation and the nature and
character of the functioning of
the one party political system in Africa.
Comments
Post a Comment